🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective professional network test recently following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."